Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ

 All Forums
 General Discussion
 Collectors and Users Open Forum
 A Kazan-made Jupiter-11 with Kiev bayonet.

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Antispam question: Please provide registration password:
Answer:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

New! Upload Image

Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Elmar Lang Posted - Nov 28 2023 : 05:18:56 AM
Hello,

I've recently acquired a Jupiter-11, 13,5 cm. f:4 in its "white" aluminum barrel, for my Kiev/Contax outfit.

The only thing I've found strange, is its serial number "N° 916779", thus not beginning with the two digits indicating the production's year.

It's something new to me so, I'm asking whether anyone else encountered similar lenses with such a numbering.

Many thanks in advance,

Enzo
4   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Elmar Lang Posted - Nov 29 2023 : 12:16:07 PM
Thank you Jacques,

I've read the other discussion in the given link: all interesting info, but I think that until now there is no technical explanation for these strange numbers on Kazan-made Jupiters.

Well, at least it's a new, uncommon addition to my Contax/Kiev outfit!

All the best,

Enzo
Jacques M. Posted - Nov 29 2023 : 09:09:04 AM

The relative thread is here:

http://ussrphoto.com/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2878&SearchTerms=jupiter,11

Amitiés. Jacques.
Elmar Lang Posted - Nov 29 2023 : 02:27:07 AM
Thank you very much for the interesting information. Hopefully, we'll know more about these strange occurrences.

Besides that, I can say that this lens is a very fine one in the practical use, no different from my postwar Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 13,5/4 "red T" s.n. 3091516 belonged to my grandfather, who purchased it late in 1949 for his Contax.

Best wishes,

Enzo
xalmaz Posted - Nov 28 2023 : 12:43:52 PM
Hello Elmar,
Sometime ago this question was discussed, not remember here or on russian forums. As was defined, KOMZ sometimes mark lens without first digit(in Your case - 5, 1959 year; was found lens from 1957 and 1961 year - not single issue). Why - not defined, suggestions: exported into other countries / batches for dedicated goals(as example, supply for local newspapers photographers) / etc.

http://xalmaz.narod.ru

USSRPhoto.com Forums © USSRPhoto.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
Google